http://in-this-economy.com/2009/03/02/the-a-in-aig-stands-for-are-you-kidding/ Shit's bad and we know. Wed, 01 Feb 2012 06:35:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://in-this-economy.com/2009/03/02/the-a-in-aig-stands-for-are-you-kidding/comment-page-1/#comment-436 Free Movies Sun, 22 Mar 2009 14:42:38 +0000 http://in-this-economy.com/?p=1196#comment-436 And AIG can't even accurately report the amount in bonuses being paid these executives. First it was $165 million and now the amount is over $200 million. It seems there is no stopping the transfer of wealth from the citizens to the elite executives at such companies like AIG. This company should be immediately broken up and sold. And AIG can’t even accurately report the amount in bonuses being paid these executives. First it was $165 million and now the amount is over $200 million. It seems there is no stopping the transfer of wealth from the citizens to the elite executives at such companies like AIG. This company should be immediately broken up and sold.

]]> http://in-this-economy.com/2009/03/02/the-a-in-aig-stands-for-are-you-kidding/comment-page-1/#comment-356 Shithead trading card #7: The AIG 73 | In This Economy? Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:56:54 +0000 http://in-this-economy.com/?p=1196#comment-356 [...] on this blog (me) have been writing a lot about AIG lately. And some of the work that these people (me again) have been doing has been pretty lame (GIA? WTF?). Due to this lack of comedic inspiration, these [...] [...] on this blog (me) have been writing a lot about AIG lately. And some of the work that these people (me again) have been doing has been pretty lame (GIA? WTF?). Due to this lack of comedic inspiration, these [...]

]]> http://in-this-economy.com/2009/03/02/the-a-in-aig-stands-for-are-you-kidding/comment-page-1/#comment-331 AIG bastardizes the word “bonus” | In This Economy? Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:45:09 +0000 http://in-this-economy.com/?p=1196#comment-331 [...] I’m dumbfounded by the entire thing. How can a company that lost a record-shattering $61 billion in the fourth quarter of 2008 be handing out bonuses? Where are they getting the money for that? Oh [...] [...] I’m dumbfounded by the entire thing. How can a company that lost a record-shattering $61 billion in the fourth quarter of 2008 be handing out bonuses? Where are they getting the money for that? Oh [...]

]]> http://in-this-economy.com/2009/03/02/the-a-in-aig-stands-for-are-you-kidding/comment-page-1/#comment-207 A Story with Bite | In This Economy? Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:35:23 +0000 http://in-this-economy.com/?p=1196#comment-207 [...] and hockey players all over the country wake up tomorrow to find their dentures missing. With AIG throwing our money down the tubes $60 billion at a time and the dollar falling against other [...] [...] and hockey players all over the country wake up tomorrow to find their dentures missing. With AIG throwing our money down the tubes $60 billion at a time and the dollar falling against other [...]

]]> http://in-this-economy.com/2009/03/02/the-a-in-aig-stands-for-are-you-kidding/comment-page-1/#comment-198 Pencils Down! Schools kind of know what to do | In This Economy? Tue, 03 Mar 2009 20:58:08 +0000 http://in-this-economy.com/?p=1196#comment-198 [...] home economics class into American economics class. Because legislators with effed-up taxes, big, whiny companies, and well, everyone else claiming it’s not their fault really don’t have or deserve our trust [...] [...] home economics class into American economics class. Because legislators with effed-up taxes, big, whiny companies, and well, everyone else claiming it’s not their fault really don’t have or deserve our trust [...]

]]> http://in-this-economy.com/2009/03/02/the-a-in-aig-stands-for-are-you-kidding/comment-page-1/#comment-180 Ryan Mon, 02 Mar 2009 17:17:35 +0000 http://in-this-economy.com/?p=1196#comment-180 Initially I understood the government's move but now I am re-thinking my stance. I hadn't recalled that they received the prior money. Independent of that, it should be survival of the fittest. Every new bailout was done because without one it would be a "disaster." This has been going on for quite a while now and I have yet to see a disaster. People always find a way, no matter how bleak economic conditions appear. AIG's failing would open the door for another company to service its clients. Ryan Initially I understood the government’s move but now I am re-thinking my stance. I hadn’t recalled that they received the prior money. Independent of that, it should be survival of the fittest. Every new bailout was done because without one it would be a “disaster.” This has been going on for quite a while now and I have yet to see a disaster. People always find a way, no matter how bleak economic conditions appear. AIG’s failing would open the door for another company to service its clients.
Ryan

]]>